If you remember my second post in this series, I listed all sorts of things that a conductor must gain
 in terms of skills and knowledge. For the young conductor (or the 
experienced one, for that matter), many of the limits to your 
achievements as a conductor will be your own personal limitations as a 
musician. Your ability to hear what's happening in the music, to hear 
mistakes, to understand the structure of the music in terms of harmony 
and form--all these are a huge part of building your musicianship and of
 your ultimate success as a conductor.
As a college/university student, this means taking advantage of 
courses in music theory and ear training, but it neither begins nor ends
 there.
What happens before you get to college has a huge impact of course:
 if you studied piano or another instrument early on; were in choirs, 
orchestras, or bands; if your parents took you to concerts; if you 
studied voice; if you were part of an outstanding HS program with great 
training and experience in a fine choir . . . all of this is a part of 
your becoming a better musician.
But much of this background most likely came before your decision 
to become a conductor. So, given where you are when you begin college, 
take your own personal musicianship as far as you can.
As you begin your conducting career, this learning doesn't stop 
(note how that's an underlying premise of this whole series--becoming a 
better musician/conductor is a life-long task). You're no longer in 
classes (although you'll almost certainly attend conferences and 
workshops, and work on further degrees in conducting) but need to keep 
exploring and learning.
My own education after my Bachelor's degree was largely through the
 groups I started and conducted. While I'll talk more about finding 
opportunities to conduct later, the work I did with the Seattle Pro 
Musica ensembles--first a chamber choir, the 2nd year the Bach Ensemble 
(with which I did a Bach cantata once a month), and a chamber orchestra 
the last 3 years of my seven with SPM--preparing this repertoire gave me
 huge opportunities to improve my musicianship. At that time there were 
few Bach cantatas recorded so with many of them I needed to learn them 
from the score alone, figure out everything about how the music sounded,
 tempi, dynamics, etc. This work--and with the SPM groups I conducted 71
 different programs in 7 years--was huge in increasing my level of 
musicianship. I've often said that the work I did with these ensembles was my graduate education. No matter what opportunities you have, use them to increase the level of your musicianship.
Later, when I became interested in the work of Eric Ericson and his
 choirs, studying and then preparing and performing many contemporary 
works pushed my musicianship in an entirely different way. Being willing
 to try to understand and then conduct much of this music was another 
part of my post-graduate education.
Besides improving musicianship in terms of your ear, understanding 
of harmony, form, etc. there is also the task of becoming a better 
interpreter. Again, some of this training comes from watching the 
conductors you work with (or others you hear live or on recordings) and 
seeing how they interpret the works you sing with them. But much will 
come from listening to and studying the work of a myriad of performers. 
How do great singers shape a song? Whether listening to a great Lieder 
singer interpret Schubert or Frank Sinatra sing a pop standard, there's a
 huge amount to learn about phrasing, rubato, how to shape text, and how
 to "sell" the song. What can you learn from a great instrumentalist 
playing a sonata or concerto? What about chamber music? How does a 
chamber group communicate? How do they play with great ensemble? And we 
don't only learn from classical musicians: how about great jazz artists?
 Musical artists of all kinds teach you an enormous amount.
In terms of understanding style--whether of a particular period 
such as the late Renaissance or of an individual composer, the same 
listening is crucial. To better understand how to interpret Debussy you 
need to have heard his piano works, orchestral works, chamber music, and
 songs. The same is true of understanding the work of almost any 
composer.
Listen (live performances or recorded), watch, listen.
How good a musician you become is largely up to you. It's in your hands . . . and ears.
 
 

 

No comments:
Post a Comment